3 Discretization of the Integral Operators
The computational method is developed in a similar way to that described
in reference [20].
In order to derive the discrete forms of the integral operators
(2), (3), (4) and (5),
G is approximated by a set of n elements
G = ånj = 1 DGj . The boundary function m
is replaced by its equivalent on the approximate boundary
G. The function is then replaced by a constant on
each element. Thus for the Lk integral operator:
|
{ Lk m}G (p) » { Lk |
~ m
|
}G (p) » |
n å
j = 1
|
|
ó õ
|
DGj
|
Gk(p,q) |
~ m
|
(pj) dSq = |
n å
j = 1
|
[ |
~ m
|
(pj) { Lk |
~ e
|
}DGj (p) ] , |
| (32) |
where e is the unit function.
The other integral operators may be discretised in a similar way.
The discrete forms are thus
defined as follows:
|
{ Lk |
~ e
|
}DGj(p) = |
ó õ
|
DGj
|
Gk (p,q) dSq , |
| (33) |
|
{ Mk |
~ e
|
}DGj(p) = |
ó õ
|
DGj
|
|
¶Gk
¶nq
|
(p,q) dSq , |
| (34) |
|
{ Mkt |
~ e
|
}DGj(p; vp) = |
¶
¶vp
|
|
ó õ
|
DGj
|
Gk (p,q) dSq , |
| (35) |
|
{ Nk |
~ e
|
}DGj(p; vp) = |
¶
¶vp
|
|
ó õ
|
DGj
|
|
¶Gk
¶nq
|
(p,q) dSq , |
| (36) |
The derivative operator in (35) can always be carried inside the integral.
The same is true for the operator in (36) when p does not lie
on the element DGj. Thus we may write:
|
{ Mkt |
~ e
|
}DGj(p; vp) = |
ó õ
|
DGj
|
|
¶Gk
¶vp
|
(p,q) dSq , |
| (37) |
|
{ Nk |
~ e
|
}DGj(p; vp) = |
ó õ
|
DGj
|
|
¶2 Gk
¶vp ¶nq
|
(p,q) dSq when
p not in
D |
~ G
|
j
|
. |
| (38) |
When p not in
DGj the integrals of
(33), (34), (35) and (36) will all
be regular and hence are amenable to standard quadrature.
The same is true for the integrands of (34) and (35)
when
p Î DGj (though not on the edge of the element). However, the
evaluation of the discrete integral operators (33) and
(36) generally require special
treatment when p Î DGj.
The special techniques applied in this paper involve `subtracting out'
the singularity and evaluating the singular part and remaining regular
part separately. The following results are immediate from the
asymptotic properties of the kernel functions (28) and
(31):
|
{ Lk |
~ e
|
}DGj (p) = { L0 |
~ e
|
}DGj (p) + |
ó õ
|
DGj
|
( Gk(p,q) - G0(p,q) ) dSq , |
| (39) |
|
{ Nk |
~ e
|
}DGj (p; vp) = { N0 |
~ e
|
}DGj (p; vp) - |
1
2
|
k2 { L0 |
~ e
|
}DGj (p) + |
|
|
|
ó õ
|
DGj
|
( |
¶2 Gk
¶vp ¶nq
|
(p,q) - |
¶2 G0
¶vp ¶nq
|
(p,q) + |
1
2
|
k2 G0(p,q) ) dSq , |
| (40) |
where, in each of (39) and (40) the explicit integral is non-singular
and the remaining expressions are independent of k.
Evaluation in this way requires the computation of the regular integral
(amenable to standard quadrature) and the determination of the
subtracted out part.
In summary, the evaluation of the integral operators requires a summation
of a set of integrand values multiplied by quadrature weights. In the
case when p Î DGj the evaluation of the
subtracted out part is also required for the Lk and Nk operators.