It is instructive to consider the properties of the simple diffusion equation
¶u(x,t)
¶t
=
¶2 u(x,t)
¶x2
(6)
to illuminate the nature of the diffusion operator K and its inverse.
The equation is the one-dimensional form of
the parabolic equation (2)
with D º 1 and the first derivative terms dropped.
In the forward problem f is given and g is unknown and in the
inverse problem g is given and f is unknown.
Let u(x,t) in the model problem (6) be expanded
as a Fourier series. Let us consider one component of the
Fourier series for f of angular frequency N p
For the model equation the equation (1) can also be written in
the form of a Fredholm integral equation of the first kind
g(x) =
1
2
Ö
pT
ó õ
¥
-¥
exp{
-(x-y)2
4 T
} f(y) dy .
(7)
Discretising the equation (7) using an integral equation
method such as collocation results in a matrix-vector
equation of the form
g » Kf
(8)
where
gi = g(xi),
fi = f(xi).
The solution g of (7) for the direct problem is simply
the evaluation of an integral at each x. However for the inverse
problem the solution f of (7) entails the solution
on an integral equation of the first kind.
Such equations are notoriously difficult to solve, especially
for integral operators with smooth kernels, such as the Gaussian
kernel in (7).
The matrix K in (8) will generally be severely
ill-conditioned.
An outline of the difficulties associated with first kind
equations and methods for their solution is given in Miller
(1974), for example.
The Fourier analysis and the first kind equation (7) provide
important information on some of the properties of the diffusion
operator.
For example the eigenvalues of the model problem (6) are e(-N2 p2 T)
for N=1,2,..., hence the eigenvalues cluster and tend to zero as
N ® ¥.
It follows from the Fourier analysis
that fN = eN2 p2 T gN
and so that the inverse problem effects a growth
factor of e(N2 p2 T) on the sinusoidal function gN.
Equation (7)
demonstrates other interesting properties of the
diffusion operator K. In particular, if f is a delta function then g is
a Gaussian and if f is step function then the discontinuity
is smoothed in g to an error function. The general conclusion
that can be made from this is that g is a C¥ function
whereas f may belong to the space of C0 or simply L2
The danger of non-existence of a solution to the inverse problem
can easily be demonstrated. For example if f is a delta distribution
then it becomes
a Gaussian distribution of greater and greater spread with T.
If the result is observed at T then the precise form of the
Gaussian distribution is given by (7). It might be thought that
with g being a smooth function there should not be any problem
in returning a solution. However there is clearly no inverse solution
for reverse times of T1 > T. Hence it is easily the case that
even an apparently benign function g can have no inverse.